# 科研答辩风

## 适用场景

- 多来源条款核对
- 规则严谨拆解
- 政策、合规、券商或银行条款解释
- 需要“证据链”感的文章配图

## MAOMOMO 出图 Brief

```json
{
  "style_name": "scientific-defense",
  "visual_direction": "clean academic defense style adapted for Chinese fintech article, evidence-driven, source-aware",
  "canvas": {
    "aspect_ratio": "16:9",
    "background": "white or pale gray",
    "composition": "research question / evidence / conclusion / caveat sections",
    "density": "medium-high but organized"
  },
  "color_palette": {
    "primary": "deep blue or slate",
    "accent": "MAOMOMO orange for caveats and key conclusion",
    "neutral": "gray lines and pale panels"
  },
  "typography": {
    "title": "formal bold Chinese title",
    "labels": "source, condition, limitation labels",
    "text_quality": "precise Chinese terms"
  },
  "layout_patterns": [
    "source comparison matrix",
    "condition tree plus final conclusion",
    "timeline of official rules",
    "evidence cards with risk caveat"
  ],
  "avoid": [
    "over-promotional activity poster",
    "uncited absolute claim",
    "fake official document screenshot",
    "decorative cat dominance"
  ]
}
```

## Prompt 片段

```text
浅色严谨版式，来源卡片、条件树、证据矩阵和结论区清晰，暖橙强调风险提示，白橘猫只作为小型品牌元素，包含 MAOMOMO 标识。可见文字只允许出现指定业务文案、MAOMOMO 和已核对允许出现的品牌 / 支付标识。
```